<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Intelligent Designers and Evolutionists Battle for the Web</title>
	<atom:link href="http://about.primal.com/2009/12/intelligent-designers-and-evolutionists-battle-for-the-web-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://about.primal.com/2009/12/intelligent-designers-and-evolutionists-battle-for-the-web-2/</link>
	<description>Put your thoughts to work</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Sep 2010 23:33:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peter Sweeney (@petersweeney)</title>
		<link>http://about.primal.com/2009/12/intelligent-designers-and-evolutionists-battle-for-the-web-2/comment-page-1/#comment-113</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Sweeney (@petersweeney)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 02:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://corp.primalfusion.com/blogs/ideas/?p=183#comment-113</guid>
		<description>You make a good point, Tony. All other things being equal, you would expect content that is more finely targeted to specific needs would be more highly valued.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You make a good point, Tony. All other things being equal, you would expect content that is more finely targeted to specific needs would be more highly valued.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Sarris</title>
		<link>http://about.primal.com/2009/12/intelligent-designers-and-evolutionists-battle-for-the-web-2/comment-page-1/#comment-112</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Sarris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 18:28:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://corp.primalfusion.com/blogs/ideas/?p=183#comment-112</guid>
		<description>Peter,

An enjoyable read, and in general I tend to agree with your descriptions of both positions and their arguments. One thing I take issue with though is the assertion about high quality for the general market. I&#039;m not sure that&#039;s where high quality matters or should be targeted. Personally, I want (and am willing to &#039;pay for&#039; in various ways) high quality for very specialized interests or needs that I have, and associated searches to find, filter, aggregate and otherwise process that content into a form that best fits my need. And that tends to fit with the model of the physical manufacturing world where premiums tend to be paid for specialized rather than general products. Best wishes for the new year to you and all the staff at Primal Fusion!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter,</p>
<p>An enjoyable read, and in general I tend to agree with your descriptions of both positions and their arguments. One thing I take issue with though is the assertion about high quality for the general market. I&#8217;m not sure that&#8217;s where high quality matters or should be targeted. Personally, I want (and am willing to &#8216;pay for&#8217; in various ways) high quality for very specialized interests or needs that I have, and associated searches to find, filter, aggregate and otherwise process that content into a form that best fits my need. And that tends to fit with the model of the physical manufacturing world where premiums tend to be paid for specialized rather than general products. Best wishes for the new year to you and all the staff at Primal Fusion!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

